When I started with Sony in 2014 I choose the A7s due to it would bracket 5 at +/- 3ev, it was the HDR days, but today use 5 +/- 2ev for sunrise/sets mainly to get a small round sun vs a big blown out and to get the dark side of say driftwood/boats/buildings in even blue hour bright and white. SW is really amazing even redoing some old 2005 point and shoot images. Really did not show much just talk and what he could see!!! I personally think it is software and today's Though Popsys does point out it's more of a difference than you might think, it's still not enough to convince me I need high megapixel cameras for printing purposes, though I admittedly do lean on extra resolution when it comes to cropping and product imagery. In this video, James Popsys discusses his experience with shooting and printing images of different megapixels and how much of a role the megapixels play. But, if you want to have the highest quality prints at a reasonably large size, say A2 or bigger, then extra megapixels might come in handy. You can even print the images large and have them perfectly usable. The first thing to note is that you can print great-looking images with relatively low-megapixel cameras, especially if you know what you're doing. But, what about when you want to print a little larger than usual? There have been myriad examples of how low megapixel cameras can produce brilliant image quality and this transfers to printing. The diminishing returns on useful quality are extremely high and most people are no longer interested in getting the most megapixels possible. The megapixel race is tired and has more or less come to an end.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |